Wi-Fi security — gone in 60 seconds, AGAIN.
You're not one of those people who leave their wi-fi network open to anyone who passes by, are you? You realize, of course, that--beside the obvious security risks to your computers, your network, your passwords, email, accounting files, your bank account, private identity, maybe even sensitive medical information--that anything someone else does on your network will be traced back to you--the resident and ISP subscriber? Say, for example, the kid next door decides to use your "lightning fast DSL" to download, or worse--share--his music collection via Bit Torrent. The RIAA subpoena will be addressed to you. Or, suppose someone driving by decides to stop and explore his sexual curiosities where they can't be traced back to his network. The search warrant will be addressed to you.
But, that's not your problem, right? Because your wi-fi network is encrypted, right? I remember, back in the day, I used to brag that it would be easier to poach my cable connection from the street than hack my wi-fi, because I was using WEP encryption (cracked in 2001), a MAC filter (easily spoofed), AND I cloaked my SSID (worthless). Since then, came WPA, and more recently WPA2.
If I lost you at "lighting fast DSL", then the following probably is your problem: Computer scientists in Japan have developed a way to break the WPA encryption system used in wireless routers in just one minute. For those keeping up, presumably you upgraded your router firmware some time back, or purchased and configured a new router to utilize WPA2--which is, so far, considered to be secure. ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- New Attack Cracks Common Wi-Fi Encryption in a Minute (PC World) :: Yahoo! News: Technology News
- Researchers crack WPA Wi-Fi encryption in 60 seconds :: Between the Lines
- Crack breaks WPA-encrypted Wi-Fi in 1 minute :: MacNN | The Macintosh News Network
- WPA Wi-Fi Encryption Cracked In Sixty Seconds :: PhysOrg.com - latest science and technology news stories
Similar Wikipedia Articles
Sex Offenders: They have an app for that?
Thanks to online sex offender registries, many neighbors are telling registered sex offenders to "get lost!" (Some more aggressively than others.) Now, thanks to a new GPS-enabled iPhone app, sex offenders never have to get lost again. The Sex Offender Locator, re-released in Apple's App Store today, uses the iPhone's built-in GPS to display a real-time moving map of every registered offender near your current position. Perhaps, not the best example of using cutting-edge technology from the war "over there" to secure citizens "over here". Much as another iPhone app, Trapster, helps traffic violators circumvent the law, the Offender Locator also helps people circumvent violators who couldn't circumvent the law.
One unintended consequence that probably won't please neighbors who take offense to the presence of offenders in their neighborhood: In a pinch, the app also serves as an ad-hock guidance system to help offenders find their way home.
Not to be accused of favoring one violator over another, Apple removed the "Top 10" listed application from it's app store on August 6, 2009, just a few days after release, because it violated another law: The one that says it's illegal to sell people's personal information in the state of California. In an ironic twist, the developers could have obeyed the law, and simply given the software away for free, but instead chose to sell it in blatant exercise of capitalism and violation of state statute.
For no apparent reason, Apple re-released the software today--for profit. (Which might be the most apparent reason.) So, whether you're looking to meet sex offenders or to avoid them like a speed trap, you'd better buy your copy now, before the law catches up with them.
Read more @ Gizmodo (http://gizmodo.com/5331700/apple-yanks-sex-offender-locator-from-app-store-to-the-relief-of-perverts-everywhere)
Amazon pities that crazy fool Murdoch, but will Kindle owners?
News Corp.'s (NWS) Rupert Murdoch is mad--perhaps literally and figuratively. Presumably, billions of dollars in losses will have that effect on a person. Not surprisingly, he's looking for ways to stop the bleeding--or, he's just looking for revenge. It's hard to tell.
First, he's ordered an end to the free ride. That means, no more free online news. Yes, FoxNews.com too. (Hey, that's fair and balanced, right?) Then, he negotiated with Amazon.com, a higher revenue share for Wall Street Journal electronic Kindle subscriptions. And, finally, he issued an ultimatum: Give us the names of Kindle subscribers, or we walk.
During his fiscal-year-end earnings call with analysts, Murdoch said, "...we don't get the names of the subscribers. Kindle treats them as their subscribers, not as ours, and I think that will eventually cause a break with us."
Murdoch also made it clear that News Corp had no intention of competing with the Kindle e-reader, but instead stressed the need for News Corp properties to "return to their old margins of profitability... Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalizing its ability to produce good reporting."
Still, Kindle subscribers have already been paying for the Wall Street Journal, despite the fact that The Wall Street Journal Online has been giving away the same content for free. But, apparently, Murdoch is willing to give up that revenue for what appears to be a turf-war over the ownership of personal subscriber data.
The whole fight begs the question: Do Kindle owners see themselves as Amazon subscribers or Wall Street Journal Subscribers, and--in the end--does it matter how they see themselves?
As for Murdoch's state of mind: Is he howling mad, or is he crazy like a Fox News Host? That remains to be seen. But, if he messes with Amazon subscribers, I pity the fool.
Similar Blog & News Articles
- News Corp may charge for Web news; blasts Amazon :: Reuters: Technology News
- Rupert Murdoch has it all wrong about fee-based web content :: BloggingStocks
- Murdoch: Bye Bye Free :: Andy Beal's Marketing Pilgrim
- News Corp. Mogul Cries 'Charge!' for Online News :: BusinessWeek.com -- Technology
- Murdoch signals end of free news :: BBC News | Business | World Edition
Similar Wikipedia Articles
Amazon goes Big Brother on Kindle’s “1984″
In an ironically Orwellian move, on July 17, 2009 Amazon.com remotely deleted illegally-sold copies of George Orwell's "1984" and "Animal Farm" from its customer's Kindle e-book readers.
This issue is unique to electronic goods, so it's important to parse the words carefully. The books were indeed sold illegally through, and by, Amazon.com. The legitimacy of the purchases, however, does not seem to be in question. The Kindle owners made a legal purchase, of an item that was not legal for Amazon.com to sell in the United States.
The electronic books that Amazon sold are in the public domain in Canada and Australia, but not in the United States. Effectively, works in the public domain belong to the public. What can be confusing, however, is that something in the public domain--or free to use-- in one country, may not be public domain in another. Naturally, an Amazon.com purchaser might simply assume--considering that Amazon requires their billing address to make a purchase--that the item they were purchasing was neither free, nor illegal to purchase
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13512_3-10290133-23.html
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Digging Deeper Into Amazon's Orwellian Moment :: Medialoper
- Amazon apologizes for Orwell Kindle mishap but was it too late? :: Web Ink Now
- Some E-Books Are More Equal Than Others :: Pogue's Posts
- Student Sues Amazon For Deleting His Homework :: Bloggers Blog: Blogging the Blogsphere
- Amazon Removes Books from Kindle, Exposing the True Concern: They're Watching, They're in Control :: michaelzimmer.org
- Amazon Removes Orwell Books From Kindles :: Gizmos, Gadgets, Technology and more










